.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Benthos

Explore the murky depths of life...

Sunday, August 28

...

The range of emotions that are surging through me right now are mighty inexplicable.
I need time to gather my thoughts...
And I have a foreboding that eternity wouldn't suffice...

Tuesday, August 16

Memories...

A sliver of light ruptures the night sky.
Raindrops fall effortlessly.
I stand, absorbing the ambience.
Drenched in memories...

A lifetime seems to have passed.
Many milestones successfully reached.
I dwell, in these thoughts.
Bleed in memories...

A clap of thunder pierces through.
Urging me to surface. But
I sink, into the depths.
Drowned in memories...

Friday, August 12

Un-Detached...

Thoughts hitherto buried,
Grappled with and deemed destroyed;
Surrepticiously surface,
Clogging development;
Commanding their analysis and dissection.
Leaving me un-detached...

Sunday, August 7

PHILTHY MATH

A lot can happen in an hour...

The most significant lessons are learnt through seemingly insignificant incidents. I learned a lot from a math problem:

X and D belong to the same set. However their properties are different. When together they have never tallied in any equation. i.e. They satisfy the condition
X + D != c
(where != stands for not equal to and c is an unknown constant).
But one day X and D decide to balance the equation. X decides to bring an operator called CONFIDES IN into the equation.
So the relation now is X CONFIDES IN D = ?
1) Determine the R.H.S.
2) Determine why X chose the operator CONFIDES IN over other prominent ones such as LOOSE TALKS WITH, BICKERS WITH and the usual VERBAL VOLLEYS WITH.

I figured that this the only mathematical problem with a PHILOSOPHICAL answer.

ANS 1)
Since X and D had never really known each other too well inspite of them being in the same superset (Albeit numerous opportunities were put forth by life) they cowered from getting to know each other. Result: They probably never will. But if they do, I predict that the R.H.S would definitely be A FRIENDSHIP TO TREASURE.

ANS 2)
Part 1: X has finally grown up.
PART 2: X would've used CONFIDES IN operator whether or not the term alongside it was D. Hence D was merely a victim of circumstance. The operator CONFIDES IN would've been used by X even if the variables in the equation were A, B or C!
Not everything that happens to you is pre-ordained. There is no 'destiny'. It's just 'chance'. X needed to be balanced and did so by using CONFIDES IN operator on D.
D on the other hand feels that if being there for X helped in balancing the equation, then all's well...

A lot can happen in an hour...

A PHILTHY MATH problem left unattended to for a year can be solved.

Wednesday, August 3

The beginning of the end...

I came equipped with the profound satisfaction that second year would sure have its advantages. Not only would I have juniors doting over me, I'd also also know the exact location of the local lizards.
But the doting remains an unfulfilled fantasy and the lizards continue to creep into the worst imaginable crannies of the shelves.
*pout, hands crossed*
Then I land in a classroom with zilch ceiling fans. (Welcome to M1: Can you smell the sweat?)
And saw the same faces. Asked the same question: "How were the hols?"
Ate the same mess food (What happened to promises of "new menu" next sem?)
And waited for an hour to get hold of a working computer in the hostel net centre to write this.
And learnt the same lesson: Some things never change...